Guide to Energy
Efficient Ventilation
(
click here for details)

£29 (GBP) Including
Postage

The International                        UPDATED 28th May 2010
Journal of Ventilation
Published Quarterly www.ijovent.org.uk          Buy Journal  Online 

June 2010 Edition of the IJV now Published

Google
 
Web www.ijovent.org.uk
www.veetech.co.uk
Logo

IAQVEC 2010 The 7th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Energy Conservation in Buildings

August 15 - 18 2010  Syracuse, New York, USA

  Interactive Ventilation
Calculator
Interactive Occupancy CO2
Concentration Calculator
Interactive Toxic Gas Ingress Calculator

 

 

Home
Contacting the IJV
Privacy Statement
Subscription Details
Editorial Board
IJV Online
IJV Shop
IJV Vol 1 Contents
IJV Vol 2 Contents
IJV Vol 3 Contents
IJV Vol 4 Contents
IJV Vol 5 Contents
IJV Vol 6 Contents
IJV Vol 7 Contents
IJV Vol 8 Contents
IJ Ventilation Vol 9
Journal of Ventilation
Guide to Ventilation
The Editor
Copyright
Disclaimer

 

IJV Volume 5 No 4 Abstracts

Paper 3
Experimental Evaluation of Combined DCV and Economizer Cycle using a FLC Variable Air Volume (VAV) System

R. Karunakaran1, R.Parameshwaran1, S. Iniyan1 , Anand A. Samuel2

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Anna University , Chennai-25, India
2Vellore Institute of Technology , Deemed University, Vellore , India

Abstract

A healthy indoor environment with sufficient fresh air is a prerequisite for the well-being and high productivity of building occupants. Carbon dioxide (CO2) based Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) optimizes and resolves the traditional conflict between reducing ventilation to save energy while maintaining adequate ventilation for air quality. Therefore, in conditioned spaces where occupancy levels vary, CO2 based DCV can prove to be an energy efficient method for meeting ventilation needs while maintaining good IAQ.  Furthermore, an economizer cycle can be used to save cooling energy. This design scheme takes advantage of cool weather conditions to supplement or satisfy the cooling load. When a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller is used, it can respond only to linear variations using single input and single output operations. This can be improved by using a Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC). This paper deals with the energy savings in a VAV air conditioning system achieved by combining DCV with an air conditioning economizer cycle incorporating FLC. The CO2 concentration and outside temperature are taken as input and damper angle as output for the FLC. Both laboratory measurements and simulations were made. Simulation was undertaken using MATLAB-Simulink.  The potential energy savings of DCV combined with a temperature economizer cycle is in the range of 28% to 79% for VAV systems and 19% to 42% for CAV systems. The Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) is also maintained. An experimental test rig was developed and used to verify the performance of the system. This experimental work has been conducted to obtain the system’s response for design outdoor conditions.

Key words:  demand controlled ventilation, DCV, fuzzy logic controller, indoor air quality, IAQ, economizer cycle, laboratory measurements, simulations, energy savings.

 References

ASHRAE: (2001) ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62-2001 “Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality”, American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineering, Atlanta , GA.

ASHRAE: (2005) “ ASHRAE Handbook Fundamentals”, American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineering, Atlanta , GA.

A Persily, J Braun, S Emmerich, K Mercer, T Lawrence (2004), “Recommendations for application of CO2 Based demand controlled ventilation, including proposed guidance for ASHRAE standard 62 and California’s Title 24”, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Purdue University, pp 1-7.

A-M Bernard, M Blazy and M-C Lemaire (2000), “Performance of demand controlled ventilation: Case study”, Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, Vol.2 pp 693-698.

 Grace SA, D. Mohan Lal, C. Sharmeela (2004) “Demand controlled systems with fuzzy controllers to maintain indoor air quality-An energy saving approach”, International Journal of Ventilation, (3) pp. 79-86.

Kalaiselvam.S, Vidhya sagar velichet, Iniyan.S, Anand A. Samuel (2006 ) , “ Comparative energy analysis of a Constant air volume CAV) system and a Variable air volume (VAV) system for an software laboratory”, International Journal of Ventilation, (5) pp 229-238.

L Felker (2002),“Minimum outside air damper control”, ASHRAE Journal, pp 30-36.

Mads Mysen, Sveinung Berntsen, Per Nafstad, Peter G. schild (2005), “Occupancy density and benefits of demand controlled ventilation in Norwegian primary schools”, Energy and Buildings, pp 1-7.

Martin, J.V.Ringwood, J.J.Gran (2002), “A single bladed ventilation damper: Mixing ratio models and measurement”, Bio Systems Engineering, Vol.82 (2), pp 187-198.

MB Schell , SC Turner, RO Shim: (1998), “Application of CO2 based demand controlled ventilation using ASHRAE Standard 62: optimizing energy use and ventilation”, ASHRAE Transaction Symposia, pp 1213-1225.

Mohsin A. Alalawi, Moncef Krarti (1998), “Experimental evaluation of CO2 based demand controlled ventilation strategies”, ASHRAE Transactions, pp307-316.

Moncef Krarti and Mohsin Al-Alawi: (2004)  “Analysis of the impact of CO2 based demand controlled ventilation strategies on energy consumption”, ASHRAE Transactions, pp 274-286.

R Norris, Ramavarapu, S.Sreenivas: (1997), “On a control policy that maintains Indoor Air Quality in a Variable Air Volume Air Handling Unit”, Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on control application, pp 886-897.

Shengwei Wang and Xinhua Xu (2004), “Optimal and robust control of outdoor ventilation air flow rate for improving energy efficiency and IAQ”, Building and Environment 39, 2004, pp 763-773.

Timothy J. Ross (1998),“Fuzzy logic with Engineering application,” Mc. Graw Hill Inc. Edition, chapter 13.

Tseng Yao (1994), “Air Handling System Design”, Mc Graw Hill, Inc.

Yu-Pei Ke, Stanley A.Mumma (1997), “Using Carbon Dioxide Measurements to determine occupancy for ventilation controls”, ASHRAE Transactions: Symposia, pp 365-374.

Contents

Paper 1

Indoor Air Quality in Fifty Residences in Athens : Santamouris, M., Argiroudis, K., Georgiou, M., Livada, I. , Doukas, P., Assimakopoulos, M.N., Sfakianaki, A., Pavlou,  K., Geros V. and Papaglastra, M.

Paper 2

Variable Air Volume-Flow Systems - A Possible Way to Reduce Energy Use in the Swedish Dairy Industry: Rohdin, P. and Moshfegh, B.  

Paper 3

Experimental Evaluation of Combined DCV and Economizer Cycle Using a FLC Variable Air Volume (VAV) System: Karunakaran, R., Parameshwaran, R., Iniyan, S. and Anand A. Samuel  

Paper 4

Effects of Nozzle Geometry on the Air Flow Jet and Temperature Distribution in an Enclosed Space: Khan, M.I.  

Paper 5

Automatic Ventilation Control of Trickle Ventilators: Ridley, I. , Davies, M., Booth, W., Judd, C., Oreszczyn, T. and Mumovic, D.  

Paper 6

Minimum Outdoor Air Supply for Radon in High Rise Residential Buildings - Natural Ventilation v Air-Conditioning Unit: Lam, K.S., Chan, E.H.W., Chan, D.W.T., Fung, W.Y., Law, K.C. and Tai, C.T.

Paper 7

Measurement and Prediction of Aerodynamic Stability of an Axial-Flow Ventilation Fan near the Stall Condition: Cao, R. and Hu, J.  

Paper 8

Natural and Mixed Ventilation Design via CFD and Architectural Modelling: Todorovic, M., Ecim, O., Marjanovic, A. and Randjelovic, I.  

 

 

    

                                              

This Site has been created and is operated by VEETECH Ltd. Registered in England. Company Registration No: 4155262 Director: Martin W. Liddament . Please click VEETECH link for privacy statement and contact information