Guide to Energy
Efficient Ventilation
(
click here for details)

£29 (GBP) Including
Postage

The International                        UPDATED 28th May 2010
Journal of Ventilation
Published Quarterly www.ijovent.org.uk          Buy Journal  Online 

June 2010 Edition of the IJV now Published

Google
 
Web www.ijovent.org.uk
www.veetech.co.uk
Logo

IAQVEC 2010 The 7th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Energy Conservation in Buildings

August 15 - 18 2010  Syracuse, New York, USA

  Interactive Ventilation
Calculator
Interactive Occupancy CO2
Concentration Calculator
Interactive Toxic Gas Ingress Calculator

 

 

Home
Contacting the IJV
Privacy Statement
Subscription Details
Editorial Board
IJV Online
IJV Shop
IJV Vol 1 Contents
IJV Vol 2 Contents
IJV Vol 3 Contents
IJV Vol 4 Contents
IJV Vol 5 Contents
IJV Vol 6 Contents
IJV Vol 7 Contents
IJV Vol 8 Contents
IJ Ventilation Vol 9
Journal of Ventilation
Guide to Ventilation
The Editor
Copyright
Disclaimer

 


Paper 3:  Volume 4 No.3 December 2005 Edition

A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of a Low Energy School ( City Academy ) in the UK

Ian Pegg1, Andrew Cripps2 and Maria Kolokotroni3

1Buro Happold and Brunel University
2Buro Happold, 17 Newman Street, London , W1T 1PD , UK
3Brunel University, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK  

Abstract

The UK construction industry is beginning to take notice of Post Occupancy Evaluations (POE) of completed buildings. POE studies have found that actual energy consumption in buildings often bears no resemblance to design predictions and low-level comfort problems persist. In the UK , there are a growing number of supporters for the routine use of POE in the construction industry. This paper discusses the in-use performance of an Advanced Naturally Ventilated secondary school building in the UK . The building features open plan classrooms, night cooling and automatically controlled solar shading and ventilation openings.  The study includes (a) long term monitoring of the thermal environment in classrooms, (b) short term analysis of environmental conditions and (c) parametric analysis of environmental conditions using advanced thermal modelling. Monitored data indicates that the summertime overheating criteria was achieved using the night cooling strategy and that the open plan classrooms achieved very good Indoor Air Quality (IAQ). However it was noted that there was a trade off between the IAQ and the acoustic environment. It was found that the internal environment on the second floor could be improved significantly by controlling sky-light openings using information about wind direction. The information from the study is being fed back to the design team and findings incorporated in future projects.

Key words:  natural ventilation, post occupancy evaluation, thermal comfort, passive cooling, school.

References

Andersen A and Hopkins C: (2005) “Sound measurements and natural ventilation in schools”, International Journal of Ventilation, 4, (1), pp57-70.

Baird G: (1995) “Building evaluation techniques”, McGraw Hill.

Bordass B, Cohen R, Standeven M and Leaman A: (2001) “Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings”, Building Research & Information, 29, (2).

CIBSE: (1998) “Thermal storage: environmental benefits”, Research Report RR6, The Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers.

CIBSE: (2001) “Ventilation and air conditioning, CIBSE Guide B2”, The Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers.

Coley D and Beisteiner A: (2002) “Carbon dioxide levels and ventilation rates in schools”, International Journal of Ventilation, 1 (1), pp 45-52.

Construction Task Force: (1998) “Rethinking construction. DETR”, London (‘The Egan Report’).

DfES: (2003a) “Building Bulletin 87 – guidelines for environmental design in schools”, Department for Education and Skills, The Stationary Office.

DfES: (2003b) “Building Bulletin 93 – Acoustic design of schools”, Department for Education and Skills, The Stationary Office.

DfES, (2004a) “Energy and water benchmarks for maintained schools in england : 2002-03”, Department for Education and Skills (http://www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SBU/b000477/index.shtml).

DfES: (2004b) “Schools capital – Investment for all”, Department for Education and Skills. DfES publications.

Karava P, Stathopoulos T and Athienitis A: (2004) “Wind driven flow through openings – a review of discharge coefficients”, The International Journal of Ventilation, 3, (3), pp255-266.

Kolokotroni M, Webb BC and Hayes SD : (1998) “Summer cooling with night ventilation for office buildings in moderate climates”, Energy and Buildings, 27, (3), pp231-237.

Mara T, Garde F, Boyer H and Mamode M: (2001) “Empirical validation of the thermal model of a passive solar cell test”, Energy and Buildings, 33, pp589-599.

Marcus TA, Whyman P, Morgan J, Whitton D, Maver T, Canter D and Fleming J: (1972) “Building performance”, Applied Science Publishing Ltd, London.

Preiser W and Vischer J: (2005) “Assessing building performance”, Elsevier.

Seppanen O, Fisk W and Mendell J: (1999) “Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings”, Indoor Air, 9, (4), pp226.

Wargocki P, Bako-Biro Z, Clausen G and Fanger O: (2002) “Air quality in a simulated office environment as a result of reducing pollution sources and increasing ventilation”, Energy and Buildings, 34, (8), pp775-783.

 

 

IJV Volume 4 No 3
Contents

Paper 1: Vent Configuration

Paper 2: Passive Cooling

Paper 3: Post Occupancy

Paper 4: Hybrid Ventilation

Paper 5: Bioclimate

Paper 6: Human Factors

Paper 7: CFD Reliability

Paper 8: Wind Pressure

Paper 9: Similarity Concept

 

 

    

                                              

This Site has been created and is operated by VEETECH Ltd. Registered in England. Company Registration No: 4155262 Director: Martin W. Liddament . Please click VEETECH link for privacy statement and contact information